HOME RESEARCH BUY NEW BUY USED FINANCE
   Photos Videos Reviews Compare Rebates Recalls Blue Book Values Build & Price Dealer Locator
Did you know you can...
Download brochures and buyers guides from the Autoweb library
   
Search 
 
2005 Ford F-250 Quick Spin
2nd Opinion – Wardlaw

» Get Pricing
» Get Email Updates

» Get Consumer Ratings
» Read More Reviews

» Send a Letter
» More Auto News
 
 

» Introduction
» Changes
» Road Test
» Wrap-up
» Specifications
» 2nd Opinion – Wardlaw

 
TO THE POINT What’s New? More powerful engines, trailer brake controls, updated design, beefier frame, and revised front suspension
Selling Points: A variety of strong engines and comfortable front seats
Deal Breakers: Cheap interior materials, horrible fuel economy
Our Advice: Make sure to check out the competition from Dodge and GM first, both of which offer advantages in power and capability over the Ford.

MEET THE COMPETITION Chevrolet Silverardo 2500 Extended Cab 4x4

Dodge Ram Quad Cab 4x4

TOP STORIES Galloping Mustangs, since 1965

Top Ten Most Fuel-Efficient SUVs

Ten Safe, Affordable Family Vehicles

Ten Cheap Thrills Photo Gallery

Employee Pricing Primer

Click to enlarge. 2005 Ford F-250 4x4 SuperCab XLT 2nd Opinion – Wardlaw Ask me to rank these trucks according to my soft-bellied, clean-nailed, Gap-attired urban sensibilities, and I’ve gotta put the Ford in the middle slot ahead of the cheaply-outfitted Chevy and GMC, but behind the muscular Dodge.

Industrial-strength hauling and towing requires an industrial-strength truck, and the Ford F-250 sure feels like it fits the bill to the seat of my pants. From the almost brittle unloaded ride quality to the vast expanses of dull gray plastic inside, the F-250 reeks of a work truck, and I cannot imagine why anyone who doesn’t need to haul as much as 3,200 pounds of cargo or tow a trailer of up to 10,000 pounds might wish to drive a vehicle like this on a daily basis.

Granted, I performed neither task, using the F-250 instead to commute in rain-soaked Los Angeles traffic. Ultimately, my favorite feature of our test truck was the reverse sensing system embedded within the rear bumper, which helped me avoid puncturing the toothy grillework of a late-model Nissan Maxima during parallel parking maneuvers. Also useful was the fact that fellow motorists gave our big, black pickup a wide berth, making it possible for the F-250 to punch holes in traffic the size of Texas. Otherwise, driving the F-250 was more work than pleasure, despite a comfortable perch from which to conduct business.

In a pathetic attempt to evaluate the F-250 from a real trucker’s point of view, it occurs to me that someone wearing work gloves might have trouble using some of the switches and controls inside the F-250’s cabin. Surely, with all that unused acreage on the dashboard, it’s possible to have larger buttons for the stereo, and bigger switches for the power mirrors and the headlights. Parts bin items all, yanked for use from passenger cars and expected to perform double-duty in this monstrous pick-‘em-up.

But with big-rig styling and ultra-cool roof marker lights, who cares about finding the farm report on the AM band? And with a gasoline-fired, 362-horsepower V10 engine under the hood, the F-250 isn’t exactly quick but its 457 lb.-ft. of torque makes it simple to spin the wheels on wet pavement, eliciting stares of disapproval on par with those reserved for rowdy teens blasting Ludacris at ear-bleeding decibels.

When it comes to heavy-duty pickups, you’re either a Dodge family, a Ford family, or a GM family. I possess no in-bred preferences – my Daddy won’t disown me if I buy differently from him. Ask me to rank these trucks according to my soft-bellied, clean-nailed, Gap-attired urban sensibilities, and I’ve gotta put the Ford in the middle slot ahead of the cheaply-outfitted Chevy and GMC, but behind the muscular Dodge. Simply, the Ram looks tough and mean, and let’s face it – if I’m buying something like this for light-duty personal use in L.A., I need its brash design, Hemi or Cummins turbodiesel, and the cachet of a name like “Power Wagon” to overcome my personal inadequacies.

Photos courtest of Erik Hanson

 


About Thom Blackett
Thom Blackett joined Autobytel in 2000 as a Research Analyst with the company's data division, Automotive Information Center (AIC). After four years of pouring through press kits searching for minute details, Thom jumped to Autobytel's editorial team. Born and raised in the state of Maine (no, it's not part of Canada and yes, the proper pronunciation of lobster is "lobstah"), Thom has always been a car nut, using his grandmother's potholders as steering wheels to "drive" around the house as a youngster. His biggest sorrow is never getting to know his grandfather's 1959 Caddy, or the '62 Impala Convertible and '69 Chevy Malibu that his parents once owned. As Autobytel's Road Test Editor, Thom strives to write articles that serve to inform as well as entertain. A proud member of the Motor Press Guild, Thom holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Maine. Comments may be emailed to thomb@autobytel.com.

<< Previous    
 
del.icio.us Save This Page   Digg!
 

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
 


Copyright © 1995 - 2008 Autoweb.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by AIC - Automotive Information Center

Autoweb supports the Consumer WebWatch guidelines to promote credible information practices on the Web.
For more information, click here.
Kelley Blue Book® and Blue Book® are registered trademarks of Kelley Blue Book Co., Inc.